Charlie Sheen said that because of this, his financial situation is “not great” and he’s decided to come out to the public. Sheen has admitted to spending approximately $10 million in “hush money” as some people were blackmailing him, threatening to release the information about his having HIV. How You Can Help Ukraine: Verified Charities, GoFundMe & Ways to Support Ukrainians In fact, Radar Online reports that there are multiple lawsuits that are related to Sheen’s illness that have been kept secret and a source states that:Ĭharlie had sex with multiple partners since learning his HIV status without informing them of his potentially deadly HIV infection … There are tons of girls that get a regular check from Charlie. In turn, Sheen could have potentially passed on the disease to countless women. According to Sheen, he contracted the disease four years ago, which means he was diagnosed in 2011, a year when he was with a ton of women, many of whom were porn stars. But, there are so many questions we have? How long has Sheen had the disease? How did he contract the disease? Who gave him HIV if it was contracted from a person? The questions go on and on and the answers have not been reported. Last year, the industry increased testing to every 14 days after a woman contracted HIV.The news of Charlie Sheen’s HIV diagnosis has been swirling on social media and throughout the press. After that, the porn industry adopted monthly testing for a range of sexually transmitted diseases. The last confirmed on-set HIV infection was in 2004. The industry has declared several production moratoriums in recent years, but most were for infections believed to have occurred in the private lives of actors rather than during film shoots. Health officials said other actors on the set have been notified of an HIV exposure and have been offered and accepted testing for the virus.Ī spokeswoman for the Nevada Department of Health and Human Services said Tuesday she did not have any immediate information on the case.
Both actors also independently denied having off-set sex with each other or the same third person. Genetic testing by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed a “very high match” indicating transmission had taken place between the two actors on set. One of the actors later passed the virus along to another off-set partner. One of those off-set partners is believed to have first transmitted the virus to an actor.
“Non-compliant shoots are one of the chief dangers of pushing the adult industry” out of California, the group’s statement said.Ī spokesman for the California Department of Public Health said that in addition to the HIV transmission on set between two actors, two off-set partners have tested positive for the virus as well.
List of gay porn stars who have hiv 2016 free#
The Free Speech Coalition said regulations such as the condom law drive filmmakers to locations where they don’t undergo as much scrutiny by the industry. Testing is required under industry rules. The states of Nevada and California do not require porn actors to be tested for HIV, said Weinstein, who has pushed for testing laws in both states and helped pass the condom law in Los Angeles County. “The big lie the industry has been saying all these years, there are no on-set transmissions, has been proven to be untrue,” he said. Michael Weinstein, president of the Aids Healthcare Foundation, said infections have happened before during porn productions and will likely happen again. It said performers on sets that complied with the more stringent protocols were tested and the moratorium was lifted.
The group said it joined the California Department of Public Health in declaring a production moratorium when the infections were first discovered. “Not only did this leave those who participated at risk, it made it much harder to track scene partners once the possible infection was discovered,” the coalition group said in a statement. The Free Speech Coalition, a California-based trade group for the adult film industry, said the pair of film shoots linked to the latest infections occurred in September on a Nevada set using tests that do not detect HIV as early as tests done on sets that fully comply with industry standards.
The number of porn filmmakers applying for shooting permits in the county declined from 485 in 2012 to 40 in 2013. The infections came amid a major decline in porn filming in Los Angeles County – once the center of porn production in the country – after the 2012 passage of a law requiring porn actors to use condoms during filming. “Shortly after his negative test, HIV levels in his body rose rapidly to where he could infect other actors through unprotected sex.” “In this case, the actor and production company thought he was HIV-negative during filming,” the statement said.